 |
mozilla-xp.com |  Post Question |  About |  Groups |  Contact |
 Register |  Login
|
mozilla feedback firefox
(118041)
mozilla feedback
(68295)mozilla dev super-review
(23696)mozilla feedback firefox prerelease
(21176)mozilla support firefox
(18067)mozilla feedback companion ebay
(14956)mozilla support seamonkey
(7372)mozilla support bugzilla
(6030)netscape public mozilla mail-news
(5784)netscape public mozilla browser
(4643)mozilla feedback thunderbird
(4192)mozilla support thunderbird
(3353)netscape public mozilla os2
(1941)mozilla general
(1095)mozilla dev apps seamonkey
(1047)mozilla dev tree-management
(1015)mozilla dev builds
(955)mozilla dev tech crypto checkins
(949)mozilla dev planning
(908)mozilla dev extensions
(873)mozilla dev platform
(745)mozilla test
(627)mozilla dev apps firefox
(591)mozilla dev apps thunderbird
(531)netscape public mozilla webtools
(438)mozilla dev tech xul
(435)netscape public mozilla layout xslt
(415)mozilla feedback thunderbird prerelease
(412)mozilla support calendar
(388)mozilla dev mdc feedback
(385)mozilla dev tech js-engine
(379)mozilla marketing
(378)mozilla dev l10n
(372)mozilla community drumbeat
(365)mozilla dev embedding
(362)mozilla dev tech plugins
(361)netscape public mozilla general
(347)mozilla dev apps calendar
(323)mozilla dev ports os2
(314)mozilla dev security
(303)netscape public mozilla xml
(303)netscape public mozilla calendar
(297)mozilla dev quality
(296)mozilla dev tech xpcom
(294)mozilla dev tech crypto
(291)mozilla dev security policy
(287)mozilla dev platforms mobile
(283)netscape public mozilla reviewers
(272)netscape public beta feedback
(271)netscape public mozilla crypto checkins
(266)mozilla support webtools
(262)mozilla dev l10n web
(253)mozilla dev apps bugzilla
(250)mozilla dev tech js-engine rhino
(247)mozilla dev usability
(239)mozilla dev accessibility
(230)netscape public mozilla jobs
(230)mozilla dev mdc
(227)netscape public mozilla seamonkey
(213)mozilla wishlist
(210)mozilla dev tech dom
(210)mozilla dev amo
(207)mozilla jobs
(199)netscape public mozilla test
(199)netscape public mozilla embedding
(197)mozilla support other
(188)mozilla dev tech xforms
(185)mozilla dev tech java
(180)mozilla dev mozilla-org
(179)mozilla support planning
(177)netscape public dev xul
(176)netscape public mozilla crash-data
(175)netscape public mozilla xpcom
(173)netscape public mozilla jseng
(171)mozilla dev tech layout
(167)
mozilla dev tech svg
(167)mozilla announce
(160)mozilla evangelism
(153)netscape public mozilla gtk
(152)netscape public mozilla plugins
(151)mozilla dev static-analysis
(151)netscape public mozilla qa general
(147)mozilla dev tech xml
(147)netscape public mozilla prefs
(143)mozilla dev tech network
(139)netscape public mozilla i18n
(139)netscape public mozilla rdf
(138)netscape public mozilla crypto
(136)mozilla dev apps js-debugger
(135)mozilla dev tech nspr
(135)netscape public mozilla xpinstall
(134)mozilla governance
(132)netscape public mozilla xpfe
(129)netscape public mozilla wishlist
(127)mozilla dev mdc es
(126)netscape public mozilla java
(126)mozilla dev l10n cs
(125)mozilla dev tech gfx
(124)mozilla dev tech xbl
(124)netscape public mozilla accessibility
(122)
Chatzilla & charset
Reply
| Group: mozilla.support.seamonkey |
 Subscribe
|
Posted:12/12/2009 10:46:06 PM | Replies:5 | Views:159 | Items(5) |
|
i am still with SM 1.1.14 ... i have lurked into #testday but here in
belgium, the #testday worked during the night :-). However, i have reached #testday using my prefered irc-client (named pirch) and also using chatzilla. Pirch work only with iso-8859-1. Chatzilla works with any charset, so we can choice between urf-8 (the default) and iso-8859-1. When a utf-8 client read an utf-8 post or an iso-8859-1 post using accentuated characters like some we can see here: http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/international/bylanguage/french.html all characters are readed OK. When a iso-8859-1 client read an utf-8 post or an iso-8859-1 post using accentuated characters ... all characters from iso-8859-1 are OK - but - The accentuated characters from utf-8 are garbage. I started SM-Chatzilla with the default utf-8. I sent accentuated chars into an iso-8859-1 guy. Garbage = ok I received accentuated chars from an iso-8859-1 guy. Perfect = ok I received accentuated chars from an utf-8 guy. Perfect = ok I changed the charset to iso-8859-1 in Chatzilla - Global - Clicked "Apply" then "OK". I sent accentuated chars into an iso-8859-1 guy. perfect = ok I received accentuated chars from an iso-8859-1 guy. Perfect = ok I received accentuated chars from an utf-8 guy. Garbage = ok I changed the charset to utf-8 in Chatzilla - Global - Clicked "Apply" then "OK". I sent accentuated chars into an iso-8859-1 guy. garbage = ok I received accentuated chars from an iso-8859-1 guy. Perfect = ok I received accentuated chars from an utf-8 guy. Garbage = NOT OK I am now in a status where i write in utf-8 and read in iso-8859-1. The only way to correct this status is to stop then start Chatzilla. I have no idea about how to permit the developper of SM to test and reproduce what i am talking about ... |
Ray_Net <TBRRaymond.Schmit...@TBRscarlet.be> 12/12/2009 10:46:06 PM |
|
Ray_Net wrote:
> i am still with SM 1.1.14 ... i have lurked into #testday but here in > belgium, the #testday worked during the night :-). > However, i have reached #testday using my prefered irc-client (named > pirch) and also using chatzilla. > Pirch work only with iso-8859-1. > Chatzilla works with any charset, so we can choice between urf-8 (the > default) and iso-8859-1. > > When a utf-8 client read an utf-8 post or an iso-8859-1 post using > accentuated characters like some we can see here: > http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/international/bylanguage/french.html > all characters are readed OK. > > When a iso-8859-1 client read an utf-8 post or an iso-8859-1 post using > accentuated characters ... all characters from iso-8859-1 are OK - but - > The accentuated characters from utf-8 are garbage. > > I started SM-Chatzilla with the default utf-8. > I sent accentuated chars into an iso-8859-1 guy. Garbage = ok > I received accentuated chars from an iso-8859-1 guy. Perfect = ok > I received accentuated chars from an utf-8 guy. Perfect = ok > > I changed the charset to iso-8859-1 in Chatzilla - Global - Clicked > "Apply" then "OK". > I sent accentuated chars into an iso-8859-1 guy. perfect = ok > I received accentuated chars from an iso-8859-1 guy. Perfect = ok > I received accentuated chars from an utf-8 guy. Garbage = ok > > I changed the charset to utf-8 in Chatzilla - Global - Clicked "Apply" > then "OK". > I sent accentuated chars into an iso-8859-1 guy. garbage = ok > I received accentuated chars from an iso-8859-1 guy. Perfect = ok > I received accentuated chars from an utf-8 guy. Garbage = NOT OK > > I am now in a status where i write in utf-8 and read in iso-8859-1. > > The only way to correct this status is to stop then start Chatzilla. > > I have no idea about how to permit the developper of SM to test and > reproduce what i am talking about ... > > Nobody can help me ? Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ? |
Ray_Net <TBRRaymond.Schmit...@TBRscarlet.be> 12/14/2009 11:10:55 PM |
|
Ray_Net schrieb:
> Nobody can help me ? > Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ? Looks like you have run an acceptable amount of tests ;-) regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html |
Martin Freitag <prof_nosp...@quantentunnel.de> 12/15/2009 10:39:32 AM |
|
Martin Freitag wrote:
> Ray_Net schrieb: > >> Nobody can help me ? >> Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ? > > > Looks like you have run an acceptable amount of tests ;-) > regards > May be ... Anyway ... due to the poor of interest of this bug, i believe that it will never corrected - not enough votes :-) |
Ray_Net <TBRRaymond.Schmit...@TBRscarlet.be> 12/17/2009 9:21:10 PM |
|
Ray_Net schrieb:
> Martin Freitag wrote: >> Ray_Net schrieb: >> >>> Nobody can help me ? >>> Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ? >> >> >> Looks like you have run an acceptable amount of tests ;-) >> regards >> > May be ... Anyway ... due to the poor of interest of this bug, i believe > that it will never corrected - not enough votes :-) Feel free to post the link to the bug. btw: I remember someone saying that the voting is being widely ignored (unsure if the chatzilla people handle it differently) regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html |
Martin Freitag <prof_nosp...@quantentunnel.de> 12/18/2009 12:41:23 PM |
|
Martin Freitag wrote:
> Ray_Net schrieb: >> Martin Freitag wrote: >>> Ray_Net schrieb: >>> >>>> Nobody can help me ? >>>> Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ? >>> >>> >>> Looks like you have run an acceptable amount of tests ;-) >>> regards >>> >> May be ... Anyway ... due to the poor of interest of this bug, i believe >> that it will never corrected - not enough votes :-) > > > Feel free to post the link to the bug. > btw: I remember someone saying that the voting is being widely ignored > (unsure if the chatzilla people handle it differently) > regards > OK, but: 1. I don't know how to post a bug and certainly not how to "post the link to the bug". 2. I am still in SM 1.1.14 3. Nobody will be interested by voting for this bug (without voting .... we just fill the database with another bug) 4. Nobody will be interested to solve this "little" bug .. too little. Thanks for having tried to help me :-) |
Ray_Net <TBRRaymond.Schmit...@TBRscarlet.be> 12/19/2009 2:38:52 PM |
Newest Articles
TB 8 and Spotlight search12/6/2011 4:25:10 PM
bugzilla custom field12/5/2011 5:58:03 AM
schematic needed11/30/2011 7:49:41 AM
FF3.6.24 / Ubuntu 10.04 LTS11/13/2011 12:57:22 AM
Seamonkey cannot display https sites while IE and Chrome can10/13/2011 11:33:24 PM
All Times Are GMT(UTC)